Leaving 出发咯！

I am leaving from my lovely hometown to KL tomorrow morning. My flight to Myanmar is on Monday morning, and coming back on 27th July. My flight to Taiwan is on 28th July morning, and coming back on 4th August. I promise to take many picture back from both Myanmar and Taiwan and share it to everyone who are here.

Don't miss me too much~ I will be back soon~ Take care everyone.

我明天即将从我可爱的家园出发到吉隆坡。我前往缅甸的飞机是星期一早上，而回程则是在7月27日。我前往台湾的航班是在7月28日早上，而回程是在8月4日。我答应各位会拍多多美丽的照片回来跟大家分享。

不要太想念我哦！我去去就来。各位保重！

ISA, should be abolished or amended? 内安法令，应该废除还是修改？

Internal Security Act (ISA) had been debated by both ruling and opposition parties, whether it should be abolished or amended. As we know, from the recent cases, ISA had become a tool that only for arresting someone who have different political view, and even reporter. Supporters of those being arrested had organised assembly to express their support to those being arrested under ISA.

I personally feel that, ISA is an act to protect social security when it first being intorduced. It should not be abolished. Maybe many people will disagree with my point of view, but think about it when you read the following example.

2 weeks ago, I heard this from a politician who also claim that ISA should be amended but not abolished. He said that, people annoyed with this act is due to the abuse usage of the act. People resistance created when their leaders being arrested under this act but they do nothing to threatening the country safety.

However, think carefully, not every actions under ISA were wrong. Many people had assemble and light white candle to appeal the government to release the reporter who was is inability to threaten the country safety, but no people did the same thing while Mat Selamat, the member of terrorist, was being arrested under ISA.

From the point mentioned above, we can know that ISA was not a bad act but the fault was its implementation. The existence of ISA is essential to protect our social security. Here, we can conclude that ISA should be amended, not like what opposition parties claim to be abolised, in order to prevent the act continuing being abuse by some parties, and at the same time protect our home country safety always.

内安法令已经被朝野政党争辩，是否应该废除或者修改。我们都知道，最近几个案例，内安法令成为了一个逮捕政治立场对立的人士，或是记者。这些人士的支持者也举行了集会来声援被捕人士。

我个人认为，内安法令当初成立的目的是为了保护社会秩序。这不应该被废除。很多人或许会不同意我的看法，但是请在看了以下例子后重新思考这个问题。

2个星期前，我听了一位主张修改内安法令的政治人物的演说。他说，人们会厌烦这个法令是因为这法令遭到滥用。人们的反对声是因他们的领袖在没有威胁国家安全的情况下被捕而起。

但是，我们必须想一想，不是每一个内安法令的行动都是错误的。很多人聚集在一起点白蜡烛要求政府释放那位无力威胁国家安全的记者，但是却没有人在恐怖分子Mat Selamat在内安法令下被捕的时候做出相同的事情。

从这个观点，我们就能知道其实内安法令不是一个不好的法令，但是他的执行出现了偏差。内安法令的存在的确能保障社会安宁。因此，我们可以总结，内安法令应该被修改，而不是像反对党主张的废除，以便这个法令能够防止被一些人滥用，同时保护我们的家园。